signup button

Do you care whether our government's policies are based on sound science? Worried about health or your kids' science education? Want to know what's up with climate change and energy? Or what we're doing to build the next great American economy? See the Top American Science Questions and sign the call!

signup button Science Friday NPR: why this is important

Shawn Otto's Book Fool Me Twice Book: why this is important

National Poll Poll: why this is important

Shawn Otto's Book Launch Party Video: why this is important

Uncle Sam Wants YOU for U.S. Science

Are we losing what made America great?
A Debate on Science and America’s Future

"Given the many urgent scientific and technological challenges facing America and the rest of the world, the increasing need for accurate scientific information in political decision making, and the vital role scientific innovation plays in spurring economic growth and competitiveness, we call for public debates in which the U.S. presidential and congressional candidates share their views on the issues of The Environment, Health and Medicine, and Science and Technology Policy."

AAAS 2012 Elections Site

New Poll: Even religious voters overwhelmingly want candidates to debate science

Consensus among Protestants, Catholics for science debates, science-based policies; Twice as many think the US not spending enough on alternative energy as do defense

Apr 03, 2012 |

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE                               Contact: Shawn Lawrence Otto

Science Debate By Faith

click image to enlarge

WASHINGTON (April 3, 2012) — In a surprising rebuff of recent political wisdom that Republicans and religiously affiliated voters are becoming “anti-science,” eighty-two percent of Catholics and eighty-three percent of Protestants say it is more important that the candidates for president debate the major science challenges facing the United States than it is they debate faith and values, according to a new national public opinion poll (PDF) of attitudes about science, faith and public policy commissioned by

Other findings
click to enlarge

Science Debate All Voters

Science Debates

Science Debate by Faith

Science Debates

Science Debate by Party

Science Debate by Party

Debate Themes All Voters

Debate Themes - All Voters

Debate Themes Catholic

Debate Themes - Catholics

Debate Themes Protestant

Debate Themes - Protestants

Debate Themes Cath+Prot

Debate Themes - Cath+Prot

Born Again vs Not

Debate Themes - Born Again vs Not

Science-Based Policies

Public Policies

Science-Based by Party

Public Policies by Party

Science-Based by Faith

Public Policies by Faith

Spending Priorities

Spending Priorities

Scientific Integrity

Scientific Integrity

World Leadership

World Leadership

Exporting Scientists

Exporting Scientists

Congress Science Debates

Congressional Science Debates

Respondents ranked science third in importance as a presidential debate theme, ahead of the environment, and far ahead of faith and values, which forty-nine percent of Catholics and fifty-nine percent of Protestants rated as important, but below the economy and taxes, and national security, which ranked one and two respectively.  Even Born Again Protestants rated a presidential science debate more important overall than a faith and values debate, but they felt more strongly than non Born Agains about faith and values and national security issues.

This consensus was similar among all likely voters: eighty-five percent agreed that the presidential candidates should participate in a science debate to discuss key science-based challenges facing the United States, such as healthcare, climate change, energy, education, and innovation and the economy. Eighty-nine percent of Democrats and eighty-three percent of Republicans also agreed.  There were no major differences by gender, with eighty-three percent of men and eighty-five percent of women agreeing. 

Alternative energy is weighing heavily on voters’ minds. Fifty-three percent of all likely US voters rank developing alternative energy as a top US spending priority, second only to paying down the federal deficit. This is about twice the number of voters that think the government is not spending enough on national defense or space exploration. Funding science and math education came in fourth, just behind investing in roads and bridges, and scientific research was fifth.

The survey reveals deep concerns among Americans about their country’s ability to maintain leadership in science.  Just forty-two percent of likely voters believe the United States will remain the world leader in science just eight years from now, and eighty-five percent are concerned that an uncertain future for science funding in the US will cause scientists to leave their jobs or move to other countries.

A similar consensus exists among respondents – both overall and among Catholics and Protestants – that public policies should be based on the best available science and not the personal opinions or beliefs of elected officials, said cofounder Shawn Lawrence Otto, who said the views could have an impact on major science-driven policies such as whether and how to address climate change.

“Basing public policies on science instead of beliefs or opinions is clearly of great importance to large majorities of Americans,” added Otto.  “Even though we often hear of faith opposing science in the political arena, these findings show that that perception isn’t necessarily true.  Americans realize that so many of the most serious problems the country is facing revolve around science, that science is itself an American value, and they want to know what kind of commitment and judgment the candidates for president are going to show in actually doing something about them.  That’s why science debates should be a normal part of the political process.”

Eighty-one percent of Republicans also said it is inappropriate for elected officials to hold back or interfere with scientific reports that conflict with their own views, along with just seventy-five percent of Democrats. is a 501(C)3 nonprofit dedicated to elevating the role of science in American public dialogue.  In 2008, candidates Barack Obama and John McCain answered online questions from  Obama’s answers formed the early basis for the Obama science policy. 

The poll was conducted online by JZ Analytics (John Zogby, Senior Analyst) in partnership with Research!America and  There were 1005 respondents for a margin of error of +/- 3.2%.  More details of the methodology together with the headlines can be found at